SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Ustawowe wsparcie rozwoju sieci telekomunikacyjnych
Ustawa o wspieraniu rozwoju usług i sieci telekomunikacyjnych, która weszła w życie 15 lipca br., wprowadza szereg nowatorskich rozwiązań, mających na celu przyspieszenie rozwoju i upowszechnienie usług telekomunikacyjnych w Polsce. Doprowadzi do obniżenia kosztów przedsiębiorców telekomunikacyjnych i odbiorców tych usług (tzw. użytkowników końcowych).

 

101129094974_550360007208Alex Chiang

 
138222644565_503560007179Greg KH
This patch adds the function to pciehp that generates udev events corresponding to the hotplug event. Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h

 
157727654240_588060007688Taku Izumi
Hello Taku-san, * Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: This patchset adds an uevent framework to pci_hotplug. Why? What is this ne

 
169323074817_521260007178Greg KH
The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attention button is pressed or the MRL is opened, well... why do you need it? The operator knows he pressed

 
105724154299_581960007898Alex Chiang
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:29:11PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: Hi Greg, Alex This patchset adds an uevent framework to pci_hotplug. Why? What is this needed for? Who

 
170027984807_567360007664John Burr
* Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 06:40:56PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attent

 
188226834929_544660007801Greg KH
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:56:44AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: * Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:29:11PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: Hi Greg, Alex This

 
162622954566_586660007126Yu Zhao
Hello! If I use the lspci linux-proc access method (-A linux-proc) only 32-bits of the memory BAR physical address is displayed, with the truncation occurring on the right. Example: ...

 
155428684433_537160007629Greg KH
Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:29:11PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: Hi Greg, Alex This patchset adds an uevent framework to pci_hotplug. Why? What is this needed f

 
154921374044_584860007831Yu Zhao
Restore the volatile registers in the SR-IOV capability after the D3- D0 transition. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ driver

 
174626554628_555260007929Alex Chiang

 
121622094611_514460007330Yu Zhao
Add or remove a Virtual Function after receiving a Migrate In or Out Request. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 
194622814625_551160007801Greg KH
The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attention button is pressed or the MRL is opened, well... why do you need it? The operator knows he pressed

 
163727014668_507060007748Yu Zhao
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- Documentation/DocBook/kernel-api.tmpl | 1 + Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.txt | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 100

 
169926214885_574460007841John Burr
* Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 06:40:56PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attent

 
157522144496_520260007824Yu Zhao
Hello! If I use the lspci linux-proc access method (-A linux-proc) only 32-bits of the memory BAR physical address is displayed, with the truncation occurring on the right. Example: ...

 
113129824033_574260007689Matthew Wilcox
If a device has the SR-IOV capability, initialize it (set the ARI Capable Hierarchy in the lowest numbered PF if necessary; calculate the System Page Size for the VF MMIO, probe the VF Offset, Stride

 
107120714971_569760007117Yu Zhao
Restore the volatile registers in the SR-IOV capability after the D3- D0 transition. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ driver

 
149822194819_516660007891Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:53:12 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:25:42PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote: +config PCI_IOV + bool "PCI IOV support"

 
191529894511_579960007979Yu Zhao

 
164023074193_513560007959Yu Zhao
Add or remove the Virtual Function when the SR-IOV is enabled or disabled by the device driver. This can happen anytime rather than only at the device probe stage. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao

 
196026414941_599360007066Yu Zhao
Add or remove a Virtual Function after receiving a Migrate In or Out Request. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 
168224544137_565360007720Linus Torvalds
Hi Linus, These are the PCI fixes that have been piling up for the last week while Jesses been on vacation. I dont think theres anything questionable here. All the patches have been posted to lin

 
177126504939_558960007228Yu Zhao
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- Documentation/DocBook/kernel-api.tmpl | 1 + Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.txt | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 100

 
147927304216_599160007950Yinghai Lu
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:22:56PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote: These are the PCI fixes that have been piling up for the last week while Jesses be

 
197021684256_516260007766Yinghai Lu
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:36:05PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: please dont use that one. and use "pci: dont disable too many HT MSI mapping -v4" instead I already said Im not comfortable

 
112022644406_506160007789Matthew Wilcox
If a device has the SR-IOV capability, initialize it (set the ARI Capable Hierarchy in the lowest numbered PF if necessary; calculate the System Page Size for the VF MMIO, probe the VF Offset, Stride

 
112729394243_526560007395Matthew Wilcox
On Mittwoch 11 März 2009 20:22:56 Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote: These are the PCI fixes that have been piling up for the last week while Jesses been

 
198523624044_592460007860Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:53:12 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:25:42PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote: +config PCI_IOV + bool "PCI IOV support"

 
115224314590_536960007118Yu Zhao

 
131823904287_557460007592Rafael J Wysocki
Commit 55633af3 (PCIe portdrv: Use driver data to simplify code) added a kfree of the driver private data in pcie_port_device_remove but forgot to remove the old kfree from pcie_portdrv_remove. Sign

 
134026734856_574760007112Harry Ciao
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:08:15 -0600 Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx wrote: Commit 55633af3 (PCIe portdrv: Use driver data to simplify code) added a kfree of the driver private data in pcie_port_de

 
153528624051_577960007644Yu Zhao
Add or remove the Virtual Function when the SR-IOV is enabled or disabled by the device driver. This can happen anytime rather than only at the device probe stage. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao

 
117321114006_521760007958Greg KH
Add the PCI Device ID for the PCI Bridge Controller on AMD8111 chip, which is used by AMD8111 EDAC driver. Signed-off-by: Harry Ciao <qingtao.cao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- include/linux/pci_ids.h |

 
107721874389_566760007811Greg KH

 
178628744201_507260007754Greg KH
Hi Kay, Greg, Ive been working on this patch series recently that adds function and device level hotplug into the PCI core: rel="nofollow" thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/3495 thread

 
166527894426_552060007160Alex Chiang
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:36:54AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: - discover that e00000018cac2920 is still hanging around! What do you

 
163320694021_568560007147Alex Chiang
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:50:10AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: I thought about the allocators returning a pointer to the same location that maybe has some valid looking data hanging around, but i

 
132820214259_533460007294Vegard Nossum
* Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx : On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:50:10AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: I thought about the allocators returning a pointer to the same location that maybe has som

 
129223154481_568260007037Alex Chiang
* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx : 2009/3/9 Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : * Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx : On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:50:10AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:

 
149227684912_569360007359Alex Chiang
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Introduce pci_is_root_bus helper function. This will help make code more consistent, as well as prevent incorrect assumptions (such as pci_b

 
144625054147_587360007683Alex Chiang
From: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx pci_scan_slot() has been rewritten to be less complex and will now return the number of *new* devices found. Existing callers need not worry because they

 
103226584753_505360007601Kenji Kaneshige
We have a nice interface for re-scanning a PCI bus which will discover newly added devices, add them to the device tree, and enable them properly. Ensure that the bridge resources are properly sized

 
120126724622_546160007861Kenji Kaneshige
Hello Kenji-san, * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx : Alex Chiang wrote: We have a nice interface for re-scanning a PCI bus which will discover newly added devices, add t

 
175522994176_523660007158Kenji Kaneshige
Hello Kenji-san, * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx : Alex Chiang wrote: I hadnt gotten around to verifying/fixing existing callers of pci_do_scan_bus yet. I was foc

 
127324724926_518460007766Kenji Kaneshige
* Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx : Alex Chiang wrote: The more I think about it though, the more I think that even without the below patch to clean up the callers of pc

 
154426124271_569260007296Alex Chiang
This interface allows the user to force a rescan of all PCI buses in system, and rediscover devices that have been removed earlier. Cc: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: djwong@xxxxxxxxxx Re

 
137425174955_512660007297Alex Chiang
This is an updated version of this patch. It fixes a bug where we would remove a bridge even if it still had children. Now we check for children before attempting to remove the bridge. /ac commit

 
172727734970_534960007976Alex Chiang
* Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : * Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : This is an updated version of this patch. It fixes a bug where we would remove a bridge even if it still had children.

 
120929894274_538560007255Alex Chiang
* Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : * Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : This is an updated version of this patch. It fixes a bug where we would remove a bridge even if it still had children.