SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Najpopularniejsze domeny dla Twojej firmy w nazwa.pl (reklama)
Myślisz o zdobyciu zagranicznych rynków? Chcesz mieć adresy WWW w najbardziej rozpoznawalnych domenach? A może chciałbyś zabezpieczyć swoją markę przed wykorzystaniem jej przez kogoś innego? Powinieneś więc rozważyć rejestrację firmowych adresów WWW zawierających najpopularniejsze rozszerzenia używane na świecie.

 

187623154870_562860007657Josef Bacik
This patch removes the pinned_mutex. The extent io map has an internal tree lock that protects the tree itself, and since we only copy the extent io map when we are committing the transaction we don

 
133820104104_571260007832Josef Bacik
This patch removes the pinned_mutex. The extent io map has an internal tree lock that protects the tree itself, and since we only copy the extent io map when we are committing the transaction we don

 
180623124697_562260007044CSights
This patch cleans up the free space cache code a bit. It better documents the idiosyncrasies of tree_search_offset and makes the code make a bit more sense. I took out the info allocation at the sta

 
155621004911_555560007166CSights
This patch cleans up the free space cache code a bit. It better documents the idiosyncrasies of tree_search_offset and makes the code make a bit more sense. I took out the info allocation at the sta

 
187427614306_542160007660Chris Mason

 
121129374976_508060007539Chris Mason

 
173829034550_584260007911Chris Mason
This is true, cp makes a full copy of the file. The btrfs utilities include a program called bcp that makes a COW copy of a single file (or directory tree) with a btrfs specific ioctl. Okay,

 
167424194222_537060007681Chris Mason
This is true, cp makes a full copy of the file. The btrfs utilities include a program called bcp that makes a COW copy of a single file (or directory tree) with a btrfs specific ioctl. Okay,

 
141525964781_532660007843Chris Mason
Hi everyone, Here is an expanded example which is how I imagined COW would handle changes to the files data ("file contents"). One can pretend it is an attempt to inject mali

 
149320244604_579960007665Dmitri Nikulin
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:35 AM, CSights <csights@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi everyone,        Im curious what would happen in btrfs if the following commands were issued: #

 
145926574601_543460007165Luca Bruno
There are still some warnings of the form: format %llu expects type long long unsigned int but argument has type u64 In conjunction with -Werror, this is causing some build failures. Now theyre pro

 
197424754067_552460007681Chris Mason
Hello, recently I installed a distribution I want to look at via chroot into a btrfs subvolume on a multidevice btrfs. Now I tried to boot this, the kernel command line in GRUB looks as follows so

 
143429904100_565760007141Chris Mason

 
133727764738_511860007889Chris Mason

 
196125954914_556460007359Chris Mason

 
122828534015_583060007753Chris Mason

 
199522614228_506160007544Aaron Straus
If were waiting for a transaction to end, and it started more than five minutes ago, emit a warning. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 1 + 1 files chang

 
174322184534_584460007895David John
Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/tree-log

 
198522124670_572360007772Oliver Mattos
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:16 AM, David John <davidjonx@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Stoyan Gaydarov wrote: Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx ---  fs/btrfs/ctree.c  

 
161222914366_552660007761Hugo Mills
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:10 -0500, Stoyan Gaydarov wrote: Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |

 
188520844613_590160007901Chris Mason
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:31:41AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: After an online resize, the filesystem reports its new size, but still runs out of space at the old size: [...] Unmounting and

 
165329094161_588160007947Jens Axboe
I tried applying this patch, but the fragmentation_percent function is giving me: WARNING: "__udivdi3" [/home/partition6/yien/git/linux-git/fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! when I compile, a

 
142527134165_596060007040Simon Holm ThxF8gers
Thanks Jens! My research had indicated something about 64-bit division and using do_div, but you cleared it up for me. The fragmentation_percent function ultimately does another divide to get the p

 
185425414253_552360007584Josef Bacik

 
129528764876_566260007731Josef Bacik

 
142222864816_503560007730Josef Bacik
This patch improves the allocators packing ability to greatly improve cold-cache reads. Instead of handling the empty_size logic within find_free_extent, we simply pass it to btrfs_find_free_space,

 
193628404638_509760007608Josef Bacik
Last night, this event jammed up a good chunk of my server: Mar 4 01:51:36 vlad kernel: btrfs searching for 1716224 bytes, num_bytes 1716224, loop 2, allowed_alloc 1 Mar 4 01:51:36 vlad kernel:

 
104321454320_520960007877Yien Zheng
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:50:53PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:06:19PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: Last night, this event jammed up a good chunk of my server:

 
124929584418_550260007682Dmitri Nikulin
I just tried umounting the partition and got this: [ 1395.028651] btrfs searching for 69632 bytes, num_bytes 69632, loop 2, allowed_alloc 1 [ 1395.028661] btrfs allocation failed flags 1, wanted 696

 
108527764558_596260007960Hugo Mills
This is just a hunch, but maybe the handling of spare files (such as .vdi) is not ideal or not what were used to with extN. Normally "skipped" blocks do not count towards the disk f

 
169228594246_550860007432Jan Engelhardt
This patch lets each root keep track of a small area of contigous space from which to allocate from in order to keep blocks for different roots interleaving themselves on disk. This happens in two p

 
123728304271_587560007992Jan Engelhardt
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:09:38AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Hi, The following oops was obtained by doing some copying; its tainted-P by nvidia but maybe it still gives some hints.

 
148229714136_580360007241Jan Engelhardt
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:11:06PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Tuesday 2009-03-03 16:40, Josef Bacik wrote: The following oops was obtained by doing some copying; its tainted-P by

 
168024284198_509860007680Peter Vander Klippe
Hi, I just wanted to inform you all that Ive built btrfs packages for ubuntu (intrepid). You can find them in my PPA ( rel="nofollow" launchpad.net/~brcha/+archive/ppa launchpad.net/~brcha/+a

 
178120164455_533960007893Marc Schoechlin
Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) ## Test environment: - IBM System z900 Mainframe - Debian SID with 64 Bit Kernel - GIT Sourc

 
129826704752_554460007646Marc Schoechlin
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:16 +0100, Marc Schoechlin wrote: Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) Thanks, Ill try to repro

 
197724144475_524860007402Josef Bacik
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:36:08PM +0100, Marc Schoechlin (linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: [ 359.658789] btrfs allocation failed flags 68, wanted 4096 [ 359.659966] space_info has 932491264

 
123927724372_537660007552Lee Trager
Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took out the delayed unlink code, it wasnt making a big enough difference in any benchmarks to justify

 
161722544981_581660007911Lee Trager
Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took out the delayed unlink code, it wasnt making a big enough difference in any benchmarks to justify

 
149521334928_595160007905Lee Trager

 
184327714574_559460007752Lee Trager

 
123922914166_571460007455Steven Pratt

 
111527794226_548860007801Steven Pratt

 
103927724055_501960007409Steven Pratt
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:54 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took

 
193120824542_585860007014Steven Pratt
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 22:07:33 Steven Pratt escribió: All in all good progress. Results and graphs can be found here: rel="nofollow" btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/h

 
176328754786_533660007100Steven Pratt
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:54 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took

 
108827084392_525460007932Chris Ball
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 23:55:08 Steven Pratt escribió: Unless I am missing something, what you are referring to is a simple wraping/alignment issue in the key on the long name

 
170925384711_593660007866Steven Pratt
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 22:07:33 Steven Pratt escribió: All in all good progress. Results and graphs can be found here: rel="nofollow" btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/h

 
173720664637_579360007224Yan Zheng
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:13:10PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, This patch (against experimental HEAD) attempts to make shrinking more robust, by only updating device size if weve succeeded

 
120120164307_574460007339Chris Ball
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 23:55:08 Steven Pratt escribió: Unless I am missing something, what you are referring to is a simple wraping/alignment issue in the key on the long name

 

 

home   |    register   |    login